2016年雅思考试每日一练（）-四六级复习辅导-文都网校
/////卫生职称
热销考研课程
热销医学课程
您暂时还没有可结算的选购课程。
您购物车里有(&&)件未结算课程。
公务员卫生职称
2016年雅思考试每日一练（）
　　为了便于参加雅思考试的考生复习，下面是小编为大家整理的雅思考试每日一练练习题，供大家练习。　　THE closer the federal government comes to hitting the limit imposed by
Congress on its borrowing and thus defaulting on some of its obligations, the
more frantically members of Congress churn out schemes to avert the impending
disaster. As The Economist went to press, the House of Representatives was
poised to vote on the latest plan, put forward by John Boehner, the speaker and
leading Republican voice in the debate about the debt ceiling. But the measure’s
prospects seem uncertain in the House and even bleaker in the Senate. Several
more plans wait in the wings, but all face the same difficulty: passing muster
both with the Republican scourges of government who run the House and the more
reluctant budget-cutters from the Democratic Party in charge of the Senate and
the White House. Meanwhile, the Treasury insists it will run out of money after
August 2nd, whereupon it will have to stop paying at least some bills.　　Since Republicans took control of the House at the beginning of the year,
they have given warning that they will not simply wave through an increase in
the debt ceiling, as Congress has usually done in the past. Never mind that in
April a majority of them voted for an interim budget that assumed that the debt
ceiling would be lifted, and for a longer-term budget resolution that would
require it to leap by almost $9 trillion over the next decade. America’s
deficits, they argued, were unsustainable, and the bargaining power conferred on
them by the need to raise the debt ceiling presented a wonderful opportunity to
stop the rot.　　In a speech in May Mr Boehner explained that he would want dramatic
reductions in government spending in exchange for an increase. “We should be
talking about cuts of trillions, not just billions. They should be actual cuts
and programme reforms, not broad deficit or debt targets that punt the tough
questions to the future.” As recently as last week he was discussing just such a
deal with Barack Obama, who despite having presented a spendthrift budget
earlier in the year had professed a willingness to trim future deficits by as
much as $4 trillion. On July 22nd, however, Mr Boehner withdrew from the
negotiations, saying that Mr Obama was too eager to raise taxes―something that
almost all Republicans in the House had sworn not to do. (By most accounts, Mr
Obama was talking chiefly about eliminating or reducing loopholes and exemptions
in the tax code, albeit on a grand scale.)　　Even as Messrs Boehner and Obama were falling out, the Senate rejected a
bill passed by the House that would have slashed spending next year, capped it
in future and prevented the debt ceiling from being lifted until Congress
approved an amendment to the constitution that barred the federal government
from running deficits even as it made it harder to raise taxes. That, the
Democrats complained, was far too draconian. The harried Mr Boehner responded on
July 25th with a lesser measure that he said would cut spending by $915 billion,
and raise the debt ceiling by a little less―only enough to keep the government
going for about six months. The bill would also set up a panel of 12 congressmen
to recommend another $1.8 trillion of cuts, which if enacted would prompt
another $1.6 trillion rise in the debt ceiling. Tax rises would be ruled out
from the start.　　Many of Mr Boehner’s foot-soldiers in the House are unhappy with this
proposal. They complain that it abandons the principles he laid out in May, by
resorting to committees and spending caps rather than detailed reforms.
Thirty-nine of them have vowed not to vote for any increase in the debt ceiling
unless it is accompanied by a balanced-budget amendment―something that Mr
Boehner’s bill only offers a vote on. Worse, the non-partisan Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) declared on July 26th that his sums did not add up,
prompting him to delay a vote on the bill while he rejigged it.　　Even if Mr Boehner’s plan scrapes through the House, Harry Reid, the leader
of the Democratic majority in the Senate, says it is “dead on arrival” in his
chamber: his entire caucus has signed a letter opposing it. Not only does it set
the stage for another crisis just a few months from now, Democrats complain, but
it also rigs future negotiations on reducing the deficit in the Republicans’
favour. The White House, too, is threatening a veto.　　That is the state of play. The fact that Mr Boehner’s plan is too extreme
for the Democrats in the Senate and too mild for many Republicans in the House
shows how hard it will be to get any other scheme approved by both chambers. Mr
Reid has proposed one, which would cut spending by $2.4 trillion or so and raise
the debt ceiling by the same amount, enough to keep the government going past
next year’s elections. But Republicans don’t like it because almost half of the
savings come from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan―something that
was already on the cards. Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell, the leader of the
Republican minority in the Senate, has a scheme to transfer the authority to
raise the debt ceiling to the president, which would at least spare Republicans
the embarrassment of voting for an increase, even if it does not cut the deficit
at all. And there is lots of talk about a short-term increase, if no lasting
plan can be agreed on.　　In the end, the leaders of the two chambers are likely to put some sort of
amalgam of all these plans to a vote, and can probably wring enough votes out of
their underlings to secure passage. Mr Obama, for his part, would presumably
sign any bill that had won the approval of the Democrats in the Senate. The
alternative, most observers assume, is simply too horrible: payments withheld
from pensioners, soldiers, government contractors and the like, higher interest
rates, chaos in the financial markets and the harm to an already sickly economy
that all this would bring.　　So far the markets have shown only muted signs of disquiet. Stock prices
have continued their slow but steady downward drift of the past week. The dollar
slipped against some safer currencies, especially the Swiss franc. The price of
insuring against an American default rose. And in auctions of government debt
this week, the cost the American government pays to borrow ticked up ever so
slightly. But these mild movements seem predicated on the assumption that
Congress will pull a rabbit out of a hat within the next few days. The longer
the rabbit takes to appear, however, the less quiescent the markets will become.
And even if the debt ceiling is raised, ratings agencies are still threatening
to downgrade America’s debt―because the long-term fiscal outlook is so grim.
责任编辑：(
更多雅思考试相关文章阅读
文都网校CET46微博《英语3》答案_百度文库
两大类热门资源免费畅读
续费一年阅读会员，立省24元！
《英语3》答案
上传于||暂无简介
阅读已结束，如果下载本文需要使用0下载券
想免费下载更多文档？
下载文档到电脑，查找使用更方便
还剩13页未读，继续阅读
你可能喜欢2016英语学习辅导报答案网7年级下册第25期_百度知道
2016英语学习辅导报答案网7年级下册第25期
2016英语学习辅导报答案网7年级下册第25期
1. How does ,do
3.I play soccer with my friends every Tuesday and Friday afternoon. 1-5 ABBCC
6-10 ABBABII. Why does.arrives at &#47I. A gets to
3. half an hour doingIV. David Beckham is my favorite player, playIII. One possible version, going to
2. 1-5 CCACB
6-10 CBACBV. I am going to be afootball player like him when I grow up. 1. going to be
4. famous soccer star
My favorite sport issoccer. What is. It can also make me strong. I think it is very popular all over the world. It helps tokeep us healthy, like
4. make usstronger
其他类似问题
为您推荐：
英语学习辅导报的相关知识
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁 上传我的文档
 下载
 收藏
该文档贡献者很忙，什么也没留下。
 下载此文档
正在努力加载中...
英语辅导报
下载积分：4500
内容提示：日
《英语辅导报》是全国小学生英语竞赛(NECPS)的权威指定用报 本报独家提供2009年全国小学生英语能力竞赛(NECPS),即全国小学生英语奥林匹克竞赛(奥英)样题,并对2010年竞赛进行全程辅导,帮助学生在2010年全国唯一的英语学科竞赛中
文档格式：PDF|
浏览次数：168|
上传日期： 21:54:58|
文档星级：
该用户还上传了这些文档
英语辅导报
官方公共微信}